THE LIMITATION OF CYBER WARFARE UNDER HUMANITARIAN LAW (Pembatasan Perang Siber dalam Hukum Humaniter)

Amalia Zuhra, Laila Almira

Abstract


States and non-State armed groups are increasingly employing cyber capabilities in their military operations in the digitalization environment today. There is a controversy about how current international legal frameworks, especially International Humanitarian Law (IHL), applies to such conduct in cyberspace, most notably in the context of armed conflict. Because one of the fundamental aims of the IHL is to protect civilians from the impact of armed conflict, it is critical to explore the norms of IHL that regulate such operations. This article will be likely to discuss about cyber warfare in the term of armed conflict. Lastly, the article will be reviewing the rules and principle that applies during the cyber warfare.

 


Keywords


Cyber warfare; cyber-attack; distinction principle; proportionality principle; precautionary measure.

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0| PDF views : 0

References


(ICRC), I. C. of the R. C. (2011). Study on the Use of the Emblems: Operational and Commercial and Other Non-operational Issues. ICRC. http://www.scribd.com/icrc/documents%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/BCE6628B-FF54-4B3F-AF01-9F63B10A6058

Brown, G., & Poellet, K. (2012). The Customary International Law of Cyberspace. Strategic Studies, 6(3), 126–145. http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/apjinternational/apj-s/2013/2013-1/2013_1_06_brown_s_eng.pdf

Chang, Z. (2017). Cyberwarfare and International Humanitarian Law. Creighton International and Comparative Law Journal, 9(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973182

Droege, C. (2012). Get off My Cloud: Cyber Warfare, International Humanitarian Law, and the Protection of Civilians. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 533–578. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383113000246

Geiss, R. (2013). Cyber Warfare: Implications for Non-international Armed Conflicts. International Law Studies, 89, 627–645. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/118026/1/118026.pdf

Geiß, R., & Lahmann, H. (2012). Cyber Warfare: Applying the Principle of Distinction in an Interconnected Space. Israel Law Review, 45(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223712000179

Geneva Convention Relative To the Protection of Civilian Persons, 163.

Henckaerts, J. M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700

Hollis, D. B. (2018). International Law and State Cyber Operations: Improving Transparency. Inter-American Judicial Committee, August, 1. https://www.wired.com/story/2017-biggest-hacks-so-far/

International Court of Justice. (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.

International Criminal Court. (2009). Judgment ICC-01/05-01/08-424, 15 June 2009, Situation in the Central African Republic in the Case of The Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo. https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2009_04528.PDF

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1993-1998. (n.d.). Judgment IT-98-29-T, 5 December 2003, The Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galić.

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1993-1998. (1999). Decision on Defence Motion on Hearsay. In Andre Klip. Goran Sluitter (Ed.), Prosecutor v. Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-T, T.Ch.II, 5 August 1996, Klip/Sluiter ALC-I- (Vol. 7, Issue 6 2). Intersentia.

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia 1993-1998. (2005). Judgment IT-03-66-T, 30 November 2005, The Prosecutor v. Fatmir Limaj.

Islam, M. S. (2017). Cyber Warfare and International Humanitarian Law : A Study. International Journal of Ethics in Social Sciences, 5(1), 101–111.

Jensen, E. T. (2013). Cyber Attacks: Proportionality and Precautions in Attack. International Law Studies, 89(198), 21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2154938

Lehm, A. J. (2013). Cyber Attacks in the Context of International Humanitarian Law. Master Thesis, University of Oslo.

Melzer, N. (2011). Cyberwarfare and International Law. UNIDIR Resources. https://unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/cyberwarfare-and-international-law-382.pdf

Pascucci, P. (2017). Distinction and Proportionality in Cyberwar: Virtual Problems with a Real Solution. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 26(2), 419–460. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/217210854.pdf

Pictet, J. S. (1958). Commentary Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War: Vol. IV. International Committee of the Red Cross. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501329227-0026803

Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, 30.

Rodenhauser, T., Gisel, L., & Maybee, L. (2021). Signaling Legal Protection in a Digitalizing World: a New Era for the Distinctive Emblems? Humanitarian Law and Policy. https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2021/09/16/legal-protection-digital-emblem/

Schmitt, M. N. (2008). Cyber Operations and the Jus in Bello: Key Issues. In Naval War College International Law Studies. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1801176

Schmitt, M. N. (2012). “Attack” as a Term of Art in International Law: The Cyber Operations Context. In K. Z. (Eds. . C. Czosseck, R. Ottis (Ed.), 2012 4th International Conference on Cyber Conflict. NATO CCD COE. https://ccdcoe.org/uploads/2012/01/5_2_Schmitt_AttackAsATermOfArt.pdf

Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (M. N. Schmitt (ed.)). Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/teras-lrev.v3i1.10741

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.