SISTEM INFORMASI MANAGEMEN DAN AKUNTANSI BARANG MILIK NEGARA DALAM PENERAPAN AKUNTANSI BERBASIS AKRUAL

Isti'anah Isti'anah

Abstract


One of mandate from Law No. 17/2003, which is one package of the State Finance Regulation, is the implementation of accrual accounting is believed to contain a better policy planning and a more informative approach to asset management. The reform of accounting practices in the government sector has strongly influenced property asset management. On a global scale, implementation of accrual basis as a way to bring the government believed to be more accountable and transparent in the use of resources and government policies in order to execute and perform the duties of State. Indonesia has implemented an asset management system of the State, namely Information Systems and Management of State Assets (SIMAK-BMN) which is part of the Agency Accounting System (SAI). SIMAK-BMN process acquisition of transaction, changes and removal of BMN to support Financial Accounting System (SAK) to Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, this system produces various reports, books, and cards that provide managerial information in the management of BMN. Administration activities and reporting of State Property by SIMAK-BMN is a standard in determining of value asset state which proper, correct and reliable. SIMAK - BMN besides supporting the implementation of the accountability, also provide various informations to the management public goods. One such issue is the relationship between accounting reform and asset management reform. This issue is a bundle of accounting issues: (1) how far should asset valuation on the balance sheet be pushed for real properties the government owns, (2) how does shifting to accrual-based accounting standards affect property accounting and management, and (3) how much importance should asset management policy attach to accounting rules?


Keywords


Reform ofAccounting; Acrual Accounting; SIMAK-BMN; SAK; SAI

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0| PDF views : 0

References


Accrual Accounting Budgeting Report, Supra, note 5, at 193-194

Barton, A. 1999. Public and Private Sector Accounting —The Non-identical Twins. AustralianAccounting Review 9(2): pp.22-31.

Carlin, M. 2002. Public Sector Accounting Practices in Australia—An Overview of Radical Reform in Action. Allied Academies International Conference, Nashville, Apri110-13.

Christensen, M. 2002. Accrual accounting in the public sector: the case of the New South Wales Government, Accounting History, November, Vol. 7, pp. 93-124.

Glynn, J. 1993. Public Sector Financial Control and Accounting, 2m1 Ed. Oxford: Blackwell

IFAC, 2002. Resource Accounting: Framework of Accounting Standard Setting in the UK Central, June 2002.

Olga Kaganova, James McKellar, and George Peterson,2006. Managing Government Property Asset, Urban Institute Press, 2006

Ryan, C. 1998. The introduction of accrual reporting policy in the Australian public sector: An agenda setting explanation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 5-539.

Robison, R. and Rosser, A. 1998, Contesting Reform: Indonesia's New Order and the IMF', World Development, 26 (8), pp. 1593-1609.

Tayib, M., Huga M. andAmeen, J. Financial Reporting by Malaysian Local Authorities: A Study of Needs and Requirments of The Users of Local Authority Financial Accounts, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol 12 No. 2, 1999 pp.103-120.

Widjajarso, B, Solikin, A, Priharjanto,A. 2006, Akuntansi Pemerintahan, Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta.

Walker, M. 2003. Federal Real Property: Actions Needed to Address Long-standing and Complex Problems . GAO report no. 04-119T. Testimony before the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, October 1.

Pallot, F. 2001. A Decade in Review: New Zealand's Experience with Resource Accounting and Budgeting. 17 F IN. ACCOUNTABILITY & MGMT. 383.

Richardson, R. 2001. Opening and Balancing the Books: The New Zealand allot in OECD Journal.

Yamamoto, K. 1999. Accounting system reform in Japanese local governments. Financial Accountability and Management. Vol. 5 No. 3 & 4, pp. 291-307.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v6i2.4485

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.