In-store communication of reusable bag: Application of goal-framing theory

Ayu Ekasari

Abstract


Campaigns on pro-environmental behavior are an important objective in social marketing due to the environmental problems caused by people's consumption. Therefore, social marketers need to understand the underlying factors that make people change their behavior. This research investigates the determinants of pro-environmental behavior from the perspective of goal framing theory with three overarching goals, namely hedonic, gain, and normative. The data were collected using a questionnaire survey method and analyzed by structural equation modeling. The results showed that gain and normative goals directly affect pro-environmental behavior instead of a hedonic goal. This research also showed that the biospheric value as one of the self-transcendence values moderates the effect of normative goal towards pro-environmental behavior, proposed in preliminary studies. The findings contribute to the existing research regarding pro-environmental behavior determinants and used by social marketing initiatives, especially in-store-communication, in designing the right message. Future studies need to investigate the role of hedonic and egoistic values in predicting pro-environmental behavior.


Keywords


Goal framing theory, biospheric value, pro-environmental behavior.

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0| PDF views : 0

References


Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). The relationship between people’s environmental considerations and pro-environmental behavior in Lithuania. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319

Bezençon, V., & Etemad-Sajadi, R. (2015). The effect of a sustainable label portfolio on consumer perception of ethicality and retail patronage.

Blankenberg, A.-K., & Alhusen, H. (2019). On the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Literature Review and Guide for the Empirical Economist. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473702

Bolderdijk, J. W., Knockaert, J., Steg, E. M., & Verhoef, E. T. (2011). Effects of Pay-As-You-Drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1181–1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.032

Carrero, I., & Valor, C. (2012). CSR-labelled products in retailers’ assortment: A comparative study of British and Spanish retailers. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(8), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211245425

Chakraborty, A., Singh, M. P., & Roy, M. (2017). A study of goal frames shaping pro-environmental behaviour in university students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(7), 1291–1310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2016-0185

de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831

de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2009.00048.x

De Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L., Keizer, M., Farsang, A., & Watt, A. (2012). Environmental values in post-socialist hungary: Is it useful to distinguish egoistic, altruistic and biospheric values? In Sociologicky Casopis, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2012.48.3.02

De Silva, D. G., & Pownall, R. A. J. (2014). Going green: does it depend on education, gender or income? Applied Economics, 46(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.857003

DPRD, D. (2020). larangan-penggunaan-plastik-perlu-dijadikan-ajang-edukasi. https://dprd-dkijakartaprov.go.id/pergub-larangan-penggunaan-plastik-perlu-dijadikan-ajang-edukasi/ Diakses 5 Oktober 2020.

Eren, S. S., Eroğlu, F., & Hacioglu, G. (2012). Compulsive Buying Tendencies through Materialistic and Hedonic Values among College Students in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1370–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1121

Fuentes, C., & Fredriksson, C. (2016). Sustainability service in-store: Service work and the promotion of sustainable consumption. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(5), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2015-0092

Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346.

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th edition. London: Pearson Education Limited

Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.006

Jakovcevic, A., & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.05.005

Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352

Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2011). Shopping for tomorrow: Promoting sustainable consumption within food stores. In British Food Journal, 113(7), 935–948. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111148441

Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1996). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Social Marketing Quarterly, 3(3–4), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245004.1996.9960973

Lao, K. (2014). Research on mechanism of consumer innovativeness influencing green consumption behavior. Nankai Business Review International, 5(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/NBRI-11-2013-0041

Lehner, M. (2015). Translating sustainability: The role of the retail store. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 43(4–5), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2014-0013

Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00499.x

Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2013). Goal-framing theory and norm-guided environmental behavior. In Encouraging Sustainable Behavior: Psychology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203141182

Lindenberg, S., Steg, L., Milovanovic, M., & Schipper, A. (2018). Moral hypocrisy and the hedonic shift: A goal-framing approach. Rationality and Society, 30(4), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463118795719

Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012

Okumah, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Novo, P., & Chapman, P. J. (2020). Revisiting the determinants of pro-environmental behaviour to inform land management policy: A meta-analytic structural equation model application. Land, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9050135

Park, J., & Ha, S. (2012). Understanding pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(5), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211222367

Peattie, K., & Peattie, S. (2009). Social marketing: A pathway to consumption reduction? Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.033

Saber, M., & Weber, A. (2019). How do supermarkets and discounters communicate about sustainability? A comparative analysis of sustainability reports and in-store communication. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 47(11), 1181–1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2018-0156

Saunders, S. G., Barrington, D. J., & Sridharan, S. (2015). Redefining social marketing: Beyond behavioural change. Journal of Social Marketing, 5(2), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-03-2014-0021

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2014). Research Method For Business. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research.

Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. In Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002

Steg, L., & de Groot, J. (2012). Environmental values. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, 81–92.

Steg, L., de Groot, J. I. M., Dreijerink, L., Abrahamse, W., & Siero, F. (2011). General antecedents of personal norms, policy acceptability, and intentions: the role of values, worldviews, and environmental concern. Society and Natural Resources, 24(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903214116

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Teng, C. C., & Wang, Y. M. (2015). Decisional factors driving organic food consumption: Generation of consumer purchase intentions. British Food Journal, 117(3), 1066–1081. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2013-0361

UNEP. (2012). 21 Issues for the 21st Century - Results of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. Environmental Development, 2, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2012.03.005

van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research and Social Science, 22, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022

Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014). I Am What I Am, by Looking Past the Present: The Influence of Biospheric Values and Past Behavior on Environmental Self-Identity. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512475209

Volva, L., & Djamaludin, M. D. (2018). Perilaku Penggunaan Tas Belanja pada Ibu Rumah Tangga Tidak Bekerja dalam Perspektif Theory of Planned Behavior. Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga Dan Konsumen, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.24156/jikk.2018.11.49




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v14i1.7429

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Ayu Ekasari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal manajemen dan pemasaran jasa  Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.