Perbedaan Persepsi Antara Mahasiswa Pre-Klinik Dan Klinik Terhadap Midline Shifting Pada Gigi Tiruan Lengkap

Main Article Content

Herry Makmur
Nova Adrian


Background: Facial aesthetic is affected by components that can be observed from the face as a whole (macro-esthetics), and also from the dental components (micro-esthetics). Ideally, the dental midline of a complete denture should coincide with the facial midline of the wearer (i.e. no midline shifting). Among others, one of the main aims of using complete dentures for prosthodontics treatments is to improve facial aesthetic. Consequently, the ability and competency of a dentist to detect midline shifting is vital in order to attain a complete denture with optimal esthetics. In dentistry, the relationship between individual perception of midline shifting and the level of education is often studied. Apart from gender and age, other factors such as the level of education can influence individual’s perception towards midline shifting. The objective of this study is to find out the difference between the perception of pre-clinical and clinical students towards midline shifting in complete dentures. The type of study is cross-sectional observational analytic. Materials and Methods: This study involves 128 pre-clinical and clinical students in FKG Universitas Trisakti. The student’s perception towards midline shifting is measured using 9 photos and a questionnaire. Results: 128 dental students with equal distribution between pre-clinic and clinic students participated in this study. Data analysis showed difference of perception between the two groups (p-value 0.016). Conclusions: There is a significant difference between the perception of pre-clinical and clinical students  in FKG Universitas Trisakti towards midline shifting in complete dentures.



Download data is not yet available.

Plum Analytics

Article Details



Bolender CL, Zarb GA, Carlsson GE. Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patient, 12th ed. St.Louis: Mosby; 2004. p. 354-377.

Levine JB, Finkel S. Esthetic diagnosis: a three step analysis. In: Levine JB, Millar BJ, editors. Essentials in esthetic dentistry: smile design integrating esthetics and function. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2016. p. 4-26.

Banerji S, Metha SB. Patien examination and assessment. In: Wilson NHF, Millar BJ, editors. Essentials of esthetic dentistry: principles and practice of esthetic dentistry. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2015. p. 56-86.

Takeo S, Tetsuya S, Iwao H. Influence of midline position and incisal inclination on esthetic evaluation of complete denture wearers. Prosthodont Res Pract. 2006; 5: 150-6.

Jayalakshmi NS, Ravindra S, Nagaraj KR, Rupesh PL, Harshavardhan MP. Acceptable deviation between facial and dental midlines in dentate population. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13(4): 473-477. DOI: :10.1007/s13191-012-0234-6

Alan BC, David TB. McCracken’s removable partial prosthodontics, 12th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. p. 5-6, 14-15.

Plummer KD. Maxillomandibular records and articulator. In: Arthur OR, John RI, Kevin DP, editors. Textbook of Complete Dentures. 6th ed. Connecticut: PMPH-USA; 2009. p.161-181,

John DJ, Lily TG. Removable Partial Dentures: A Clinician’s Guide. Iowa: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. 94-96.

Boksman L. Simplifying laboratory communication: The dental midline position, incisal cant and incisal horizontal plane. Oral Health J [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 19] 2010; 71-8. Available from:

Bruno PS, Emilio JC, Rafael MdF, Ana AVF, Stephen C. Perception of maxillary dental midline shift in asymmetric faces. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10(4): 558-596.

Sarah LN, Sebastian DH, Susanne S, Markus BB. Analysis of select facial and dental esthetic parameters. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014; 34(5): 623-629. DOI:10.11607/prd.1969

Jamille BF, Licinio ES, Marcia TOC, Andrea FJM, Andriana ACS, Jose NM. Perception of midline deviations in smile esthetics by laypersons. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016; 21(6): 51-7.

Jornung J, Fardal Ø. Perception of patient’s smiles. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138 (12): 1544-53. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0103

Talic N, Alomar S, Almaidhan A. Perception of Saudi dentists and lay people to altered smile esthetics. Saudi Dent J. 2013; 25(1): 13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.09.001

Cotrim ER, Vasconcelos Júnior ÁV, Haddad AC, Reis SA. Perception of adults’ smile esthetics among orthodontists, clinicians and laypeople. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015; 20(1): 40-44. DOI:10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.040-044.oar

Bansal RK. Enhancing education and practice, need for strengthening of internship (rotary housemanship) training in India. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004; 17(3): 332-8. DOI: 10.1080/13576280400002528

Tsai TC, Lin CH, Harasym PH, Violato C. Students’ perception on medical professionalism: the psychometric perspective. Med Teach. 2007; 29(2-3):128-34. DOI: 10.1080/01421590701310889

Hays R. Teaching and learning in clinical setting. London: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd; 2005.

Baseer MA, Rahman G, Al Kawaey Z, Al Awamy B, Al Manmeen Z, Al Shalaty F. Evaluation of oral health behavior of female dental hygiene students and interns of Saudi Arabia by using Hiroshima University Dental Behavioural Inventory (HU-DBI). Oral Health Dent Manag. 2013; 12(4): 255-61

Özyemişci-Cebeci N, Ünver S, Nemli SK. A comparative study of oral health attitudes and behaviors in dental students. J Dent App. 2014; 1(1);3-7

Sharda AJ, Shetty S. A comparative study of oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior of first and final year dental students of Udaipur city, Rajasthan, India. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008; 6(4): 347-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2008.00308.x

Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W. In the students’ own words: What are the strengths and weaknesses of the dental school curriculum?. J Dent Educ. 2007; 71(5): 632-45.

Özalp N, Dağ C, Ökte Z. Oral health knowledge among dental students. Clinical Dentistry and Research. 2012; 36(1): 18-24.

Dimiter K, Stefka K, Janet K. Students’ self-assessment in preclinical and clinical education of prosthetic dentistry. Journal of IMAB. 2014; 20(3): 575-7. DOI:

Azwar S. Sikap manusia, teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta : Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar; 2009.

McLaren EA, Garber DA, Figueira J.. The photoshop smile design technique (part 1): digital dental photography. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34(10): 772, 774, 776.

Feri Syahdan. Hubungan antara keterampilan kerja dengan produktivitas kerja. Psikoborneo 2017; 5(1): 1-10.

Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Asymmetry of The Face in Ortodontic Patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(3): 421-6. DOI: 10.2319/022107-85.1

De Agostini M, Kazandjian S, Cavézian C, Lellouch J, Chokron S. Visual aesthetic preference: effects of handness, sex, and age-related reading/writing directional scanning experience. Writing Systems Research. 2010: 1-9. DOI: 10.1093/wsr/wsq006

Scharoun SM, Bryden PJ. Hand preference, performance abilities, and hand selection in children. Front Psychol. 2014;5:82. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00082