Metode Pengukuran Sudut Gonial antar Pola Vertikal Skeletal pada Sefalometri Lateral

Main Article Content

Areta Salim Andri Putri
Yuniar Zen


Background: Gonial angle is one of the angles measured in vertical skeletal analysis using lateral cephalograms. Gonial angle is made of tangent line to the posterior border of mandibular ramus with mandibular plane. Definition of gonial angle depends on mandibular plane which generally consists of various methods according to Downs, Tweed, and Steiner.  Purpose: To investigate the difference of gonial angles measurement methods among vertical skeletal patterns on lateral cephalograms. Methods: Observational analytic research was conducted on 21 lateral cephalograms of orthodontic patients who had come to one of orthodontic clinic in Solo in 2016-2021. The cephalograms were taken by the same operator using Vatech PaX-i3D™, then they were categorized into 3 vertical skeletal pattern groups. Reference points and tracings were submitted to supervising orthodontist via ZOOM twice daily in the morning and in the afternoon. The measured data was recorded in table and was analyzed with Statistical for Social Science (SPSS) program. Results: In each vertical skeletal pattern groups, there was no significant difference found among Downs’s, Tweed’s, and Steiner’s gonial angles. There was significant difference among gonial angles of hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent samples. Conclusion: There was no significant difference of three gonial angle measurement methods among three vertical skeletal patterns on lateral cephalograms.



Download data is not yet available.

Plum Analytics

Article Details



Nanda R. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. 1st ed. St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier; 2005. 38–63 p.

Okşayan R, Aktan AM, Sökücü O, Haştar E, Ciftci ME. Does the panoramic radiography have the power to identify the gonial angle in orthodontics? Sci World J. 2012;2012:1–4.

Budipramana M, Budhy TI, Ardani IGAW. Gonial angle characteristics of class iii malocclusion in javanese ethnic. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2021;21:1–8.

Rajak RRK, Shrestha RM, Koju S. Reliability of Panoramic Radiography in Assessing Gonial Angle Compared to Lateral Cephalogram in Patients with Class I Malocclusion. Taiwan J Orthod. 2021;33(2):53–9.

D’Antò V, Madariaga ACP, Rongo R, Bucci R, Simeon V, Franchi L, et al. Distribution of the condylion-gonion-menton (cogome^) angle in a population of patients from southern Italy. Dent J. 2019;7(4):1–10.

Valletta R, Rongo R, Madariaga ACP, Baiano R, Spagnuolo G, D’Antò V. Relationship between the condylion-gonion- menton angle and dentoalveolar heights. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):1–10.

Rakosi T, Jonas IJ, Graber T. Orthodontic Diagnosis (Color Atlas of Dental Medicine). 1st ed. New York: Thieme; 1993. 3–4, 121–122 p.

Mohammad RJ. Importance of Success Criteria in the Validity of Panoramic Radiograph for Measurement of Gonial Angle Importance of Success Criteria in the Validity of Panoramic Radiograph for Measurement of Gonial Angle. 2020;8(1):50–5.

Behl A, Grewal S, Bajaj K, Baweja P, Kaur G, Kataria P. Mandibular ramus and gonial angle - Identification tool in age estimation and sex determination: A digital panoramic radiographic study in north indian population. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2020;32(1):31–6.

ul-Haq H, Memon S, Agha D. Comparison Between Three Methods of Gonial Angle Formation on Lateral Cephalogram and Orthopantomogram. J Pakistan Dent Assoc. 2018;27(2):57–61.

Kula K, Ghoneima A. Cephalometry in Orthodontics: 2D and 3D. 1st ed. Batavia, Il: Quintessence Publishing; 2018. 17–45 p.

Tweed C. The Frankfort-Mandibular Plane Angle in Orthodontic Diagnosis, Classification, Treatment Planning, and Prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32(4):175–230.

Helal NM, Basri OA, Baeshen HA. Significance of cephalometric radiograph in orthodontic treatment plan decision. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20(7):789–7793.

Durão APR, Morosolli A, Pittayapat P, Bolstad N, Ferreira AP, Jacobs R. Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: A comparative study. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015;45(4):213–20.

Lagravère MO, Low C, Flores-Mir C, Chung R, Carey JP, Heo G, et al. Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;137(5):598–604.

Mohammad HA, Abu Hassan MI, Hussain SF. Cephalometric evaluation for Malaysian Malay by Steiner analysis. Sci Res Essays. 2011;6(3):627–34.

Ribeiro HT, Faria AC, Terreri AL, De Mello-Filho FV. A cephalometric analysis for evaluation of changes in soft tissues in the regions of the upper and lower lips and chin due to orthognathic maxillary advancement surgery. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;18(1):57–62.

Downs W. The Role of Cephalometrics in Orthodontic Case Analysis and Diagnosis. Am J Orthod. 1952;38(3):162–82.

Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for You and Me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39(10):729–55.

Jacobson A. Radiographic Cephalometry: From Basics to Videoimaging. IL: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.; 1995. 53–61 p.

Oyonarte R, Hurtado M, Castro MV. Evolution of ANB and SN-GoGn angles during craniofacial growth: A retrospective longitudinal study. APOS Trends Orthod. 2016;6:295–301.

Bajracharya M, Rajbhandari A, Pradhan R, Manandhar P, Maharjan S, Pant BD. Gonial angle by lateral cephalogram in orthodontic patients of a tertiary care hospital: A descriptive cross-sectional study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021;59(237):482–5.

Niño-Sandoval TC, Frazão M, Vasconcelos BC do E. Shape differences among symmetrically shaped skeletal growth patterns in a panoramic view: a Fourier analysis. Braz Oral Res. 2021;35:e034.

Park S-H, Kim Y-J, Lee S-H, Kim C-C, Jang K-T. The Simple Regression Model of Gonial Angles : Comparison between Panoramic Radiographs and Lateral Cephalograms. J Korean Acad Pedtatric Dent. 2017;44(2):129–37.

Araki M, Kiyosaki T, Sato M, Kohinata K, Matsumoto K, Honda K. Comparative analysis of the gonial angle on lateral cephalometric radiographs and panoramic radiographs. J Oral Sci. 2015;57(4):373–8.

Bora M, Bijay SS, Phukon K. A Comparative Study of External Gonial Angle Between Panoramic and Lateral Cephalometric Radiograph of Adult Patients with Class – 1 Malocclusion and to Determine It ’ s Cephalometric Value in Assamesse Population. J Contemp Orthod. 2019;3(2):15–9.

Parate AS, Chokotiya H, Sharma D, Sonwane S, Sharma P, Shrivastava S. Comparative Evaluation of the External Gonial Angle in Adults Patients with Class I Malocclusion from Panoramic Radiographs and Lateral Cephalograms. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2020;8(3):157–62.

Kundi I. Accuracy of Assessment of Gonial Angle by Both Hemispheres of Panoramic Images and Its Comparison with Lateral Cephalometric Radiographic Measurements. J Dent Heal Oral Disord Ther. 2016;4(4):97–9.

Leversha J, McKeough G, Myrteza A, Skjellrup-Wakefiled H, Welsh J, Sholapurkar A. Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016;8(1):e49–54.

Srineeraja P. Determination of angle of mandible from mandibular bones and orthopantomograph. J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;7(8):579–81.

Ardani IGAW, Wicaksono A, Hamid T. The occlusal plane inclination analysis for determining skeletal class III malocclusion diagnosis. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:163–71.

Gasgoos S, Al-Saleem N, Awni K. Cephalometric features of skeletal Class I, II and III (A comparative study). Al-Rafidain Dent J. 2007;7(2):122–30.

Jacob HB, Buschang PH. Mandibular growth comparisons of Class i and Class II division 1 skeletofacial patterns. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(5):755–61.

Upadhyay R, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P, Rao N. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender, and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012;4(1):29.

Al-Jewair TS, Preston CB, Flores-Mir C, Ziarnowski P. Correlation between craniofacial growth and upper and lower body heights in subjects with class I occlusion. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018;23(2):37–45.

Rehman SA, Rizwan S, Faisal SS, Hussain SS. Association of gonial angle on panoramic radiograph with the facial divergence on lateral cephalogram. J Coll Physicians Surg Pakistan. 2020;30(4):355–8.