Determinant Factors Affecting Fraud Detection Capabilities to The External Auditor in Jakarta

Triana Yuniati, Erliana Banjarnahor

Abstract


The perspective of this study provides empirical evidence on the factors that affect the auditor's fraud detection ability. There are effective research hypotheses with auditor tenure, fraud detection experience, level of education, fraud training, prof professional skepticism. This study is hypothesis-testing research, Respondents are 120 auditors from seven public accounting firms in Jakarta participated in this study, thought a questionnaire. Data collected is done during April 201 5 by visiting the public accounting firm that has been willing to participate in this study. The type of data used is primary data and is a cross-section, data is collected only once. Conclusion of the study is auditor tenure, fraud training does not affect the ability to detect fraud. While fraud detection experience, the auditor's level of education and professional skepticism positively influence fraud detection capability. Limitations, suggestions and research implications are described at the end of this report.


Keywords


auditor tenure, fraud detection experience, level of education, fraud training, professional skepticism, external auditor

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0| PDF views : 0

References


Abdolmohammadi, M. (1999). A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Audit Task Structure, Professional Rank, and Decision Aids for Behavioral Research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 11, 51-92.

Anggriawan, E. F. (2014). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Skeptisme Profesional dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam Mendeteksi Fraud (Studi Empiris Pada KAP di DIY). Jurnal Nominal, Vol.III, No. 2 , 101-116.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2015). Auditing and Assurance Service: An Integrated Approach 15th edition. England: Pearson Education.

Asare, S. (2014, November 20). Accessed November 06, 2015, from pcaobus: http://pcaobus.org/News/Events/Documents/ 11202014_SAG/Asare.pdf

Ashton, A. (1991). Experience and Error Frequency Knowledge as Potential Determinants of Audit Expertise. The Accounting Review, Vol.66 No. 2, 218-239.

Battacharya, S. (1994). The Use of Recall And Recognition Technique In Eliciting Experienced-Inexperience Auditor In the Detection of Management Fraud. Tampa, Florida: Dissertation, University of South Florida.

Beasley, M., Carcello, J., & Hermanson, D. (2001). Top 10 Audit Deficiencies. Journal of Accountancy Vol.191, No.4, 63-66.

Bonner, S., & Walker, P. (1994). The Effects of Instruction and Experience on The Acquisition of Auditing Knowledge. The Accounting Review Vol.69, No. 1, 157-178.

Bulchia. (2008). Analisis Pengaruh Pengalaman dan Pelatihan Auditor Terhadap Pengetahuan Audtior Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jakarta: Naskah Publikasi Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Cressey, D. R. (1973). Other People's Money. Montclair: Patterson, Smith.

Fullerton, R. R., &Durtschi, C. (2004, November 11). The Effect of Professional skepticism on The Fraud Detection Skills of Internal Auditors. Taken on January 15, 2015, from SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/

Hammersley, J. L. (2011). A Review and Model of Auditor Judgments in Fraud-Related Planning Tasks. Auditing Vol. 30, No.4, 101-128.

IAI. (2012). Home: PPA: Standar Pendidikan Internasional IFAC. Accessed November 06, 2015, from IAI GLOBAL: http://www.iaiglobal.or.id

IAPI, D. (2013). Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik . Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jamal, K., Johnson, P., & Berryman, G. (1995). Detecting Framing Effects in Financial Statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 1.

Johnson, P., Jamal, K., & Berryman, R. (1991). Effects of Framing on auditor Decision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, October 75-105.

Johnson, N. (1987). Auditor Detected Errors and Related Client Traits - A Study of Inherent and Control Risks in A Sample of U.K. Audits. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting Vol.14 (Spring)., 39-64.

KPMG. (2015). Career Path - Direct-to-Audit. Accessed June, 11, 2015, from KPMG CUTTING THROUGH COMPLEXITY: http://www.kpmg.com

Koroy, T. R. (2008). PendeteksianKecurangan (Fraud) Laporan Keuangan oleh Auditor Eksternal. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vo. 10, No.1 (Mei), 22-33.

Loebecke, J., Eining, M., & Willingham, J. (2008). Auditors' Experience with Material Irregularities, Frequency, Nature, and Detectability. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 9, 1-28.

LLP, K. (2015). Career Path-Direct-to-Audit. AccessedJune, 11, 2015, http://www.kpmg.com

MentriKeuangan RI. (2002). Keputusan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia No. 423/KMK.06/2002 TentangJasaAkuntanPublik .

Merchant, G. (1990). Discussion of Determinants of Auditor Expertise. Journal of Accounting Research Vo.28 (Supplement), 1-20.

Nasution, H., &Fitriany. (2012). Pengaruh Beban Kerja, Pengalaman Audit dan Tipe Kepribadian Terhadap Skeptisme Profesional dan Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV (hal. 481-488). Banjarmasin: Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Noviyani, P., & Bandi. (2002). Pengaruh Pengalaman dan Pelatihan Terhadap Struktur Pengetahuan Auditor Tentang Kekeliruan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi V (hal. 481-488). Semarang: IkatanAkuntan Indonesia.

Noviyanti, S. (2008). Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. JurnalAkuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia Vol. 5 No.1, 102-125.

Nugraha, A. B. (2011). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Due Profesional Care dan Independensi Audtior Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Survey pada Auditor Inspektoral dan BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Barat). UniversitasKomputer Indonesia .

Pendidikan dan KebudayaanRepublik Indonesia, Mentri. (2013). PeraturanMentri Pendidikan dan KebudayaanRepublik Indonesia No.73 Tahun 2013 TentangPenerapanKerangkaKualifikasi Nasional Indonesia Bidang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Ponemon, L., & Wendell, J. P. (1995). Judgemental Versus Random Sampling in Auditing: An Experimental Investigation. Auditing, Vol. 14, No. 2, Fall, 17-.

Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 53, 252-266.

Sugiono, D. (2008). KamusBesar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa Edisi Keempat. Jakarta, Indonesia: PT. Gramedia. Pustaka Utama.

Tim Penyusun KKNI Dikti 2013. (2015, May 01). KKNI dan Implikasinya Pada Dunia Kerja dan Perguruan Tinggi. Accessed November 01, 2015, frombpa.uad: http://bpa.uad.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/ 2015/05/1.-KKNI-dan-impklikasinya.pdf

Utami, R. (2009). Analisis Perbedaan Profesionalisme Audtior Senior dan Auditor Yunior (Studiterhadap Auditor yang Bekerja Pada KAP di Malang). Malang: Naskah Publikasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Widiyastuti, M., &Pamuji, S. (2009). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Kemampuan Audtior dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Fraud). Jurnal Ilmiah Studi Manajemen Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang Vol. 5 No.2, 52-73.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/imar.v18i2.5172

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Indonesian Management and Accounting Research (IMAR)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

===================================================


Indonesian Management and Accounting Research
ISSN : 2442-9724 Online
ISSN : 1411-8858 Print

Published by
Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University)
Gedung Hendriawan Sie, 3rd floor
Jalan Kyai Tapa No.1, Grogol
Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Post Code : 11440

Email: imar.journal@trisakti.ac.id

url: http://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/imar

 

Indonesian Management and Accounting Research Indexed by:

 
 

 

 

===================================================

Creative Commons License
Indonesian Management and Accounting Research 
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.