Understanding the Influence of Corporate Social Resposibility on Firm Performance: Perception of Employee

Indraguna Kusumabrata

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to examine the perception of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on firm performance with the role of one of the potential mediators, namely job satisfaction. The main limitation of the study is the limited size of the total sample and only in one company so the result could not be generalized. This study shows how CSR is related to the performance of the company. This study based on data from 115 employees. The construct was measured by questionnaire. The results show a positive relationship between social responsibility and firm performance based on employee perceptions. By revealing the importance of social responsibility activities to corporate performance, this study contributes to the area of social responsibility research.


Keywords


Corporate Social Responsibility; job satisfaction; and firm performance.

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 149| PDF views : 0

References


Ahmad, Talat, and Saleem (2017). Employee engagement, Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction as Consequent of Perceived CSR: A Mediation Model. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, Vol. 54, No. 1, January-June, 2017.

Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K. and Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 507-525.

Barakat R. Simone, Isabella, Boaventura, and Mazzon (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on employee satisfaction. Management Decision, Vol. 54 Issue: 9, pp.2325-2339.

Bauman, C.W. and Skitka, L.J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 32, pp. 63-86.

Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, D. and Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder – company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 85 No. 2, pp. 257-272, doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9730-3.

Brunton, M., Eweje, G. and Taskin, N. (2015). Communicating corporate social responsibility to internal stakeholders: walking the walk or just talking the talk?. Business Strategy and the Environment, doi: 10.1002/bse.1889.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 497-505.

Chang, C.H. (2015). Proactive and reactive corporate social responsibility: antecedent and consequence. Management Decision, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 451-468, doi: 10.1108/md-02-2014-0060.

DeVaro, J. (2006). Strategic promotion tournaments and worker performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 721-740, doi: 10.1002/smj.542.

Drew, S. (1997). From knowledge to action: the impact of benchmarking on organizational Performance. Long Range Planning, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 427-441.

El Akremi, A., Gond, J.P., Swaen, V., De Roeck, K. and Igalens, J. (2015). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, doi: 10.1177/0149206315569311.

Elkington, John (1997). Cannibals with Forks: Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Published: Capstone.

Famiyeh Samuel, (2017). Corporate social responsibility and firm’s performance: empirical evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 13 Issue: 2, pp.390-406.

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Greenberg, Jerald dan Robert Baron (2003). Behavior in Organizations (understanding and managing the human side of work). Eight edition, Prentice Hall.

Greening, D.W. and Turban, D.B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 254-280, doi: 10.1177/000765030003900302.

Griffin, J.J., Bryant, A. and Koerber, C.P. (2015). Corporate responsibility and employee relations: from external pressure to action. Group & Organization Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 378-404, doi:10.1177/1059601114560168.

Heinze, D., Sibary, S. and Sikula, A. (1999). Relations among corporate social responsibility, financial soundness, and investment value in 22 manufacturing industry groups. Ethics & Behavior, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 331-347.

Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 125-140.

Huang, T. and Hsiao, W. (2007). The causal relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 1265-1275.

Jiang, K., Lepak, D.P., Hu, J. and Baer, J.C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 55 No. 6, pp. 1264-1294, doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0088.

Kehoe, R.R. and Wright, P.M. (2013). The impact of high-performance human resource practices on employees’ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 366-391, doi: 10.1177/0149206310365901.

Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J. and Williams, E.G. (2013). Read this article, but don’t print it: organizational citizenship behaviour toward the environment. Group and Organization Management, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 163-197, doi: 10.1177/1059601112475210.

Locke, E.A. (1976). The Nature and Consequences of Job Satisfaction. In M.D. Dunnette (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297-1349). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

Margolis, J.D. and Walsh, J. (2001), People and Profits? The Search for a Link Between a Company’s Social and Financial Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.

Mohammad, Altarifi, Alafi (2014). The Impact of Corporate Social responsibility toward employees on company Performance: A Jordanian study. Interdiciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, September 2014, Vol 6, No.5.

Onkila, T. (2015). Pride or embarrassment? Employees’ emotions and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 222-236, doi: 10.1002/csr.1340.

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L. and Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 403-441.

Paliszkiewicz, J. (2012). Orientation on trust and organizational performance, in Proceedings of Management. Knowledge and Learning International Conference, Celje, Slovenia, pp. 203-212.

Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2006). Strategy and social: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 84 No. 12, pp. 78-92.

Riordan, C.M., Gatewood, R.D. and Bill, J.B. (1997). Corporate image: employee reactions and implications for managing corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 401-412, doi: 10.1023/A:1017989205184.

Smirnova Yelena, (2012). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility in Kazakhstan. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 8 Issue: 3, pp.404-417

Suher, Bir, and Yapar (2017). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Satisfaction and Loyalty: A research on Turkish Employees. Scholar Publications, Karimganj, Assam, India, 788711. Volume-III, Issue-I, February 2017, Page No. 87-105.

Temminck, E., Mearns, K. and Fruhen, L. (2015). Motivating employees towards sustainable behaviour. Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 402-412, doi: 10.1002/ bse.1827.

The Law of the Republic of Indonesia No.40 of 2007 Concerning Limited Liability Company.

Turban, D.B. and Greening, D.W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 658-763, doi:10.2307/257057.

Wexley, K. N., and Yukl, G.A. 1994. Managemen dan Organisasi. Jakarta: PPM.

Zhu, Q., Yin, H., Liu, J. and Lai, K.H. (2014). How is employee perception of organizational efforts in corporate social responsibility related to their satisfaction and loyalty towards developing harmonious society in Chinese enterprises? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 28-40, doi: 10.1002/csr.1302.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/imar.v18i1.4488

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Indonesian Management and Accounting Research (IMAR)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

===================================================


Indonesian Management and Accounting Research
ISSN : 2442-9724 Online
ISSN : 1411-8858 Print

Published by
Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Trisakti
(Faculty of Economics and Business, Trisakti University)
Gedung Hendriawan Sie, 3rd floor
Jalan Kyai Tapa No.1, Grogol
Jakarta Barat, Indonesia
Post Code : 11440

Email: imar.journal@trisakti.ac.id

url: http://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/imar

===================================================

Creative Commons License
Indonesian Management and Accounting Research 
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.