Ngurah Pandji Mertha Agung Durya


This study aims to find evidence, the influence of Audit Quality Attributes, Client Satisfaction and Client Loyalty, which are moderated by Fraud Confirmation. The research was conducted at the BKM, a community-based organization, formed by the Government, through the Kotaku Program. The research used Regression statistical analysis and conducted a hypothesis test. Regression analysis used includes Simple Linear Regression Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis, and MRA Regression Analysis, and Path Model Linear Regression Analysis. This study also pays attention to the calculation of the coefficient of determination to give an idea of the ability of the model in explaining the phenomenon of Client Satisfaction and Client Loyalty. The result that both partially and simultaneously, Audit Quality Attributes, Fraud Confirmation affected Client Satisfaction and Loyalty. The research also succeeded in proving that Client Satisfaction mediates the effect of Audit Quality Attributes on Client Loyalty, but failed to provide empirical evidence, that the Fraud Confirmation moderated the effect of Audit Quality Attributes on Client Satisfaction and Loyalty. Contribution to audit practices, where it is important to realize Client Satisfaction through Audit Quality Attributes and Fraud Confirmation, especially in situations where Fraud acts are suspected.


Fraud, Fraud Confirmation, Audit Service, Audit Quality Attributes, Client Satisfaction, Client Loyalty

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 139| PDF views : 0


Abbott, Lawrence J; Park, Young; & Parker, Susan. (2000). The Effects of Audit Committee Activity and Independence on Corporate Fraud managerial Finance 26.11.pp.55-67.

Abdolmohammadi, Mohammad J; Searfoss, D Gerald; &Shanteau, James. (2004). An Investigation of the Attributes of Top Industry Audit Specialists. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16, pp.1-17.

Badan Keswadayaan Masyarakat Sebagai Implementasi Program P2KP. (2008). http://

Behn, Bruce K; Carcello, Joseph V; Hermanson, Dana R; Hermanson, Roger H. (1999). Client satisfaction and big 6 audit fees. ContemporaryAccountingResearch. Winter: pp.587-608.

Behn, Bruce K, Carcello, Hermanson&Roger H. Hermanson. (1997).The Determinants of Audit Client Satisfaction Among Client of Big 6 Firms. Accounting Horizons, Vol.11, No. 1, pp.7–24, March 1997.

Brown-Liburd, Helen L; &Wright, Arnold M. (2011). The Effect of Past Client Relationship and Strength of the Audit Committee on Auditor Negotiations Auditing 30.4.pp51-69.

Jiandong Chen, Douglas Cumming, WenxuanHou, & Edward Lee. (2016). Does the External Monitoring Effect of Financial Analysts Deter Corporate Fraud in China?, Journal Of Business Ethics,

Kusumawardhani, P. (2013). Deteksi Financial Statement Fraud dengan Analisis fraud triangle pada Perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa, 1(3).

Kotler, P. (2003).Marketing Management, 11th Edition.Prentice-Hall.Inc. New Jersey.pp. 85.

Hulu, Y., Harahap, R. H., & Nasutian, M. A. (2018). Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa. Jupiis: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 146-154.

Mayangsari, S. (2003). Pengaruh Keahlian Audit dan Independensi terhadap Pendapat Audit: Sebuah Kuasieksperimen. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol.6, No.1, pp.1–22.

Nurchasanah, Rizmah & Rahmanti, Wiwin. (2003). Analisis Faktor – Faktor Penentu Kualitas Audit.Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Hal. 47 – 60, Agustus 2003. STIE YKPN : Yogyakarta

Putri, E. T., Priono, H., & Susilowati, E. (2017). Kinerja Badan Jaminan Sosial Dan Kepuasan Pelanggan. ASSETS: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Akuntansi, Keuangan Dan Pajak, 1(1), 20-32.

Ratmono, D., Diany, Y. A., & Purwanto, A. (2018). Dapatkah Teori Fraud Triangle Menjelaskan Kecurangan dalam Laporan Keuangan?. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 14(2), 100-117.

Suaryana, A. (2005). Pengaruh komite audit terhadap kualitas laba. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis.


  • There are currently no refbacks.