RELEVANCE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN KAMPUNG ARRANGEMENT IN KAMPUNG PISANG, MAKASSAR, INDONESIA

Risma Ranreng, Hanny Wahidin Wiranegara, Yayat Supriatna

Abstract


Improving poor conditions of the kampung in urban areas can be solved without evictions. Eviction is not a good strategy as it will eliminate the uniqueness of kampung characteristics. Aims: This study was aimed to find out the relevance of social capital in kampung arrangement and also to understand the most influential element of the social capital and its role on the arrangement of kampung in Kampung Pisang.  Methodology and results: The study investigated the elements of social capital that affect the activities in every phase in kampung arrangement process. This was done through the analysis of data resulted from the questionnaire and interview surveys on the residents of Kampung Pisang. The result showed the most influential element of social capital is the social network in participation variable. Conclusion, significance and impact study: Participation as an element of social capital plays a major role in kampung arrangement in Kampung Pisang, Makassar city in Indonesia. By participation, the relevance of social capital in kampung arrangement is developing people’s knowledge about the environmental quality and using it in the improvement of physical environmental condition. This paper showed that kampung arrangement could be done by using social capital to hinder evictions.

Keywords


Social capital; Kampung arrangement; Kampung kota; Elements of social capital; Kampung Pisang

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wahjoerini. 2014. Faktor-Faktor yang Menentukan Eksistensi Kampung Pekojan sebagai Kampung Kota di Kota Semarang. http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/pwk/article/viewFile/7637/6291. [15 September 2016].

Silas, Johan., Ernawati R. 2013. Liveability of Settlements by People in the Kampung of Surabaya. http://www.conference.net.au/cibwbc13/papers/cibwbc2013_submission_98.pdf. [20 November 2016].

Rustiadi. Ernan, Sunsun. Saefulhakim, Panuju. Dyah R(Eds.), Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Wilayah, Jakarta, 2011.

Baliana. M Syaon (Ed.), Arsitektur, Komunitas, dan Modal Sosial, Indonesia, 2010.

Claridge, Tristan. 2004. Definition of Social Capital. Social Capital Research. http://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/literature/definition.html. [07 March 2016].

Yudohusuhodo et.al (Eds.), Rumah untuk Seluruh Rakyat, Bhrakerta, Jakarta, 1991.

Heryati. 2008. Kampung Kota sebagai Bagian dari Permukiman Kota, Studi Kasus: Tipologi Permukiman RW 01 RT 02 Kelurahan Limba B dan RW 04 RT 04 Kelurahan Biawu Kecamatan Kota Selatan, Kota Gorontalo. http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/JIN/article/view/728/671. [15 September 2016].

Sari, Amaliah N.I,. Setijanti, Purwanita. 2012. Penataan Kampung Stenkali Membangun Masyarkat dengan Desain Teknologi Perumahan Alternatif. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/15834-ID-penataan-kampung-strenkali-membangun-ketahanan-masyarakat-dengan-desain-teknolog.pdf. [27 Maret 2017].

Rolalisasi, Andarita. 2007. Community Participation In Slum Upgrading Program A Case Studi in Surabaya, East Java. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB10401.pdf. [27 March 2017].

Udjianto, Pawitro. (2012). Masyarakat Kampung Kota – Kondisi Permukimannya dan Upaya Perbaikan Lingkungan Kampung Kota (Studi Kasus: RW-12 Kelurahan Babakan Surabaya Kecamatan Kiaracondong Kota Bandung). http://www.academia.edu/4288914/masyarakat_kampung_kota_kondisi_permukimannya_dan_upaya_perbaikan_lingkungan_kampung_kota_2012. [19 September 2016].

Santosa, H. R. et, al. 2010. Comprehensive Kampung Improvement Programme to Support Better Settlement and Poverty Reduction. http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB18951.pdf. [20 November 2016].

Wates. Nick (Ed.), The Community Planning Handbook: “How people can shape their cities, towns, and villages in any part of the world, London, 2000.

Ernawati, Rita, et, al. 2013. Facing Urban Vulnerability through Kampung Development, case study of Kampung in Surabaya Indonesia. http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20130101.11.pdf. [20 November 2016].

Dhakal, Shobhakar. 2002. Surabaya (Indonesia): Comprehensice Kampung Improvement as Model of Community Participation. https://pub.iges.or.jp/pub_file/ue23028pdf/download. [20 November 2016].

Zairin, Zain. 2007. Partisipasi Komunitas Berpenghasilan Menengah ke Bawah dalam Perkembangan Permukiman Kota. https://arsumj.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/zain_070307.pdf. [25 September 2016].

Wiranegara, Hanny. 2013. A Model of Environmental Harmony Towards Sustainable Walk-up Flats Community in Kemayoran – Jakarta. http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/viewFile/6943/7080. [27 March 2016].

Arsitektur Komunitas Makassar. 2014. Kampung Pisang Makassar. https://www.scribd.com/presentation/251380643/Land-Sharing-Kampung-Pisang-Kota-Makssar. [18 October 2016].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/urbanenvirotech.v1i1.2403

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

width="60"    width="60"    width="60"    width="60"    width="60"

width="60" 

Copyright of Indonesian Journal of Urban and Environmental Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

    Creative Commons License