Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Dimensi Seni Rupa dan Desain  is a scientific journal  published by  Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Desain Universitas Trisakti since 2003 , twice times a year ( February and September).Jurnal Dimensi Seni Rupa  is published both in print and online versions 

The aim of Jurnal Dimensi  Seni Rupa dan Desain  to publish  original papers , conceptual frameworks, analytical and simulation models,  case studies, empirical research, and book reviews .Also to develop and communicate widely the development of art and design  theoretical and pragmatic.

Jurnal Dimensi Seni Rupa dan Desain  publishes papers in the fields of art and design,  culture and design ,urban design and related topics in design

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process

 

 Review Policy

  • Providing written feedback at the appropriate time on the scientific merits and scientific value of the work, it is done by documenting in writing the opinions of the best partners.
  • Indicates whether writing has a clear, concise, and relevant composition of work and rating, scientific accuracy, originality, and appeal to the reader.
  • Avoid personal comments or criticism
  • Refrain from direct author contact without editor permission
  • Notify the editor immediately if unable to review in a timely manner and provide the names of other best-interest partners
  • Determine scientific achievement, originality, and scope of work; show how to fix it, and recommend acceptance or rejection when using a rating scale
  • Taking into account all ethical concerns, such as substantial similarities between the final manuscript and any published papers or manuscripts submitted to other journals.
  • Warn editors about any personal, financial, or conflict of interest conflict and decline when reviewing possible conflicts
  • Ensure that published articles comply with journal standards
  • Protecting readers from false or defective research and studies that can not be validated by others

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics

To maintain the quality of the manuscript and to avoid publishing / plagiarism violations in the publishing process, the editorial board establishes the ethics of scientific publication Journal of Dimensions of Art and Design. This publication ethics rule applies to authors / authors, editors, bestari / reviewer partners, and journal / editorial managers. The ethics of such publication refers to the ethical provisions of scientific publications established by the Research Council of Indonesian Research Professors (MPR) 2014.

 

Author Ethics

1.Standard Reporting:

The author who wrote the research report must present an accurate report of the work that has been done and discuss the purpose of the significance of the study. The underlying data should be accurately described in the draft of the research report. The research report should contain enough details and references to enable others to imitate the work. Reports containing fraud or deliberate inaccurate data are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

2. Data and Retention Access:Where necessary the author is required to provide raw data related to editorial requirements. Authors must be prepared to provide such data within a predetermined time frame.

3.Orisality and Plagiarism:The authors must ensure that the written works are completely original and if the author uses the work and / or sentence of another person then must use the citation or quoted correctly.

4.Public publishing or content similarity:

A writer should not publish a script that describes the same study essence in more than one journal  or publisher. Sending the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

5.Recognition Source:

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications or ideas that are influential in determining the nature of the work reported

6.Compiling Report:

The authors' names should be limited to those who have contributed significantly to the concept, design, implementation or interpretation of reported research. Anyone who has contributed significantly should be listed as a co-author. Parties who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project must be recognized or registered as contributors. The lead author must ensure that the co-authors whose names are included in the report are truly eligible for inclusion, and that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the report and have agreed to publish the report.

7. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

All authors should disclose in the report script any financial conflicts or substantive conflicts of interest that may be expected to affect the results or interpretation of the report text.

8. Fundamental error in published works:

When the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the published work, the author is obliged to immediately notify the journal or publisher editor and work with the editor to retract or refine the work.

9.Risk and Human or Animal as Subject:

If the study involves chemicals, procedures or equipmen that high risk of use, the authors should mention them in the report script


Ethics Editor

1.Asas Justice:

The editor always evaluates the intellectual content of the manuscript irrespective of race, sex, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

2. Confidentiality:

The editor and any editorial staff are prohibited from disclosing any information about the manuscript submitted to anyone other than potential authors, reviewers, reviewers, editorial advisers and publishers.

3. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

Unpublished material but mentioned in a submitted manuscript should not be used in a personal research editor without the written consent of the author.

4. Publication Decision:

The editorial board of the journal is responsible for deciding on articles to be published. Editors may be guided by the policy of the editorial board of the journal and limited by legal provisions such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

5.Review Script:

The editor must ensure that any initial manuscript has been evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should manage and use peer review fairly and wisely. The editor should explain the peer review process in informing the author and indicate which parts of the journal are reviewed. The editor must use appropriate peer reviewers for the publication script by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding people with conflicts of interest.


Reviewer ethics

1. Contribution to Editorial Decision:

Peer review helps editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving the quality of the manuscript.

2. Accuracy:

Any reviewer who is selected but feels ineligible to review the research reported in the script or know that a quick review is impossible should then notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

3.Standard Objectivity:

Review must be done objectively. The personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supportive arguments.

4. Confidentiality:

Any submitted manuscript for review should be a confidential document. Scripts should not be displayed or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest:

Important information or ideas obtained through peer review should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers are prohibited to associate manuscripts with conflicts of interest caused by competitive, collaborative, or other relationships and any connection with any of the authors, companies or institutions associated with the report text.

6. Acknowledgment Source:

The reviewer must identify the published works that are relevant but not yet quoted by the author. A statement that previous observations, derivations, or arguments must be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should also increase the editor's attention on substantial or overlapping equality between reviewed scripts and any other publication of papers that they know

Journal Manager Ethics

1. Decision-making; the manager of the journal / editorial board should describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially those relating to the determination of policy and decision of journal publishing without any particular interest.

2. Freedom; journal managers should give the reviewers and editors the freedom to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the privacy of the author.

3. Warranties and promotions; journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal organizers should publish and promote publication results to the public by providing assurance of usefulness in the use of the manuscript.

4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; journal managers must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid any conflict of interest with other parties, so the process of publishing the script runs smoothly